• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • Bedfordshire
  • Milton Keynes
  • Northamptonshire
  • Awards
  • Knowledge Hub
  • Contact Us
  • About Us
    • Sustainability
    • The Podcast
    • ATB TV
All Things Business

All Things Business

First For Local UK Business News

  • Education
  • Professional Services
    • Legal
    • Finance
    • Recruitment & HR
    • Creative Marketing
  • Property
  • Environment
    • Wellbeing
  • Industry
    • Industry
    • Manufacturing
    • Motors
    • Logistics
    • Technology
  • Events
    • Events
    • Food & Drink
    • Sport
  • News

Directors’ duties: the lessons to be learned

Legal, News | November 30, 2020

Woodfines Solicitors

A Deputy Insolvency and Companies Court Judge has ruled that a director whose business went into liquidation in 2014 must repay money to his former company, Wow Internet Limited. It was ruled that he had wrongfully used company money to pay illegitimate company expenditure (e.g. to pay his own personal expenditure), that he had failed to repay his overdrawn director’s loan account, and that he had allowed unexplained cash withdrawals from the company. All of these were in breach of the director’s statutory and fiduciary duties and, in the absence of adequate records proving that the expenditure was for a legitimate company purpose, he was personally liable.

The facts

Wow Internet Limited was a digital marketing company and Mr Qasim Majid was sole director. The company was in business for just four years before entering into creditors’ voluntary liquidation (CVA) on 8 July 2014. An insolvency practitioner, Ms Gagen Sharma, was appointed to liquidate the company, with the statement of affairs revealing debts of £84,468.69; most of which was HMRC debt (nearly £72,000). Nothing was paid to these creditors while Ms Sharma was acting as liquidator, and the liquidation was closed.

In 2017, findings of misfeasance and breach of duty against Ms Sharma, led to a second insolvency practitioner, Stephen Hunt, becoming involved in some of her previous cases, including that of Wow Internet Limited. Mr Hunt’s findings resulted in the claim against Mr Majid.

What was owed?

The liquidator brought five separate successful claims against Mr Majid:

  • Repayment of £851.24 paid by the company to an accountancy firm on behalf of a second company owned by Mr Majid.
  • Repayment of £5,923 owed by Mr Majid under an overdrawn director’s loan account (Mr Majid alleged that this had been repaid).
  • Repayment of £5,119.82 for withdrawals made from the company post liquidation.
  • Repayment of £10,880.97 for illegitimate company expenditure (e.g. payments for sport and leisure, a luxury hotel chain and regular supermarket payments).
  • Repayment of £29,656.27 for unexplained cash withdrawals made from the company’s account.

Mr Majid gave various reasons for his expenditure during cross-examination including payment to suppliers, expenditure for the benefit of the company’s staff and the fact that he was owed money by the company. However, a lack of company records to prove these explanations led the judge to rule in favour of the liquidator.

How did Mr Majid breach his duties?

Under Section 387 of the Companies Act 2006, a director has a duty to maintain adequate day-to-day company records. A director also has a duty to promote the success of the company (section 172 Companies Act 2006), a duty to exercise independent judgment (section 173 Companies Act 2006), a duty to exercise reasonable care, skill and diligence (section 174 Companies Act 2006) and a duty to avoid conflicts of interest (section 175 Companies Act 2006). Failure to comply with these statutory duties, gives rise to strict liability.

As in this case, a director will be liable to account financially to a company where he or she fails to meet these statutory duties. It is not a requirement for a director to have acted dishonestly.

While Mr Majid maintained that the expenditure was legitimate company expenditure, he could not prove it by reference to company records. The court accepted that it was a directors’ obligation to evidence that a payment was legitimate and where he could not do so, due to failure to maintain adequate company records, the court would draw adverse inferences against the director with the liquidator getting the benefit of any doubt. The court made it clear that if a director conducts business informally and takes a lackadaisical approach to contemporaneous records, they do so at their own risk. This is because it would be wrong for a director to profit from their own non-compliance with Section 387 of the Companies Act.

What can be learned from this case?

In cases where a court is asked to assess whether a company transaction was a legitimate business expense, in the absence of company records that supports a director’s account, the court will give the benefit of doubt to an appointed liquidator. The focus for directors, therefore, is to keep contemporaneous records of all payments (including cash withdrawals) by the company, to include a record of their purpose and receipt.

Where a company makes a payment to a director or shareholder, documenting what the payment is for (e.g. contractual wage, expense or legitimate dividend) is crucial if the director is to later justify transactions, with recourse to company records, therefore avoiding personal liability.

For advice on directors’ duties, contact Maria Koureas-Jones at Woodfines on 01908 202150 or visit www.woodfines.co.uk

Milton Keynes

Related stories

  • MPs celebrate city status announcement Milton Keynes
    May 20, 2022

    MPs celebrate city status announcement

    MPs Iain Stewart and Ben Everitt have shared their delight as Milton Keynes was finally officially awarded city status as part of…
  • centre:mk Milton Keynes
    May 17, 2022

    Centre:mk welcomes brand new Ted Baker store to Milton Keynes

    centre:mk are pleased to announce the addition of global lifestyle brand, Ted Baker, to their store line-up in Milton Keynes later this…
  • MK Gateway Milton Keynes
    May 10, 2022

    Taking centre stage at real estate forum

    On 17-19 May, the Socius team will join over 4,000 attendees in Leeds for the annual UKREiiF event, which connects people, places…

About Rebecca Shears

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

Stay up to date on All Things Business

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to receive the latest business news.

Online Edition

Northamptonshire edition, click here
Milton Keynes edition, click here
Bedfordshire edition, click here

Most Read

  • Howes Percival A trio of new partners in East Mids among five senior promotions
  • East Hunsbury Primary School New Headteacher for East Hunsbury Primary School as tributes are paid to retiring Head after 21 years’ service
  • centre:mk Centre:mk welcomes brand new Ted Baker store to Milton Keynes
  • Windfall tax on energy companies: Chancellor and business secretary need to stand their ground against the windfall tax siren calls – MHA comments Windfall tax on energy companies: Chancellor and business secretary need to stand their ground against the windfall tax siren calls – MHA comments
  • Workplace Wellbeing Why It's So Important Workplace Wellbeing: Why it’s so important

Footer

REGIONS

Northamptonshire
Milton Keynes
Bedfordshire
 

COMPANY

About Us
Contact
Awards
Podcast
Knowledge Hub
Sustainability
Request A Copy

Northamptonshire Office

1 Queensbridge, Northampton
NN4 7BF
Tel: 01604 267677

Milton Keynes and Bedfordshire Office

The Pinnacle, 170 Midsummer Boulevard, Milton Keynes,
MK9 1BP
Tel: 01908 030688

London Office

25 Bedford Square
London
WC1B 3HH
Tel: 0208 1760176

Follow us on

  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter

All Things Business is a publication produced by All Things Management Ltd. Registered in England No. 9590677


Privacy Policy